Plan the development we want, together
Since WHaM was formed, in 2015, we have held regular meetings which are open to everyone – dates and times are posted here and on our Facebook group. We have also held several large community consultation meetings on specific issues. We’ve been busy leafletting residents, lobbying politicians and talking to developers and local media.
In February 2016 we held a public consultation meeting about a Community Vision for the area. We responded to residents’ concerns by putting together a Community Planning Brief (PDF) emphasising community-led development, including green space, doctors’ surgeries, schools and good transport links – rather than development for maximum profit.
We’ve had Saturday stalls on Malago Green, hosted a Victoria Park fest stall, held parties in the Windmill pub and represented residents at council meetings.
Our December 2016 TreeFest included decorating the trees on Malago Green. Bristol City Council has since confirmed that saving the trees could be a condition of any land sale to developers.
In February 2017 we held a packed public meeting to discuss concerns about the Rollo homes planning application. More than 50 people attended our March 2018 meeting to discuss the St Catherine’s Place consultation and proposals for a 22-storey tower block.
We continue to lobby, hold meetings, respond to consultations and keep you informed via Facebook and this website.
- Check out our guide to making an effective comment and post your comments now!
- Get involved – by coming to our next meeting, joining our Facebook group (currently more than 580 members) or using our Who to contact listings to send an email to your local councillor or MP.
- Contact us with your ideas for more events and campaigns – we’d love to hear from you.
Responding to developers
As well as setting out the community’s vision for the area, WHaM makes responses to developers on a case-by-case basis outlining key concerns, for example:
- WHaM’s comments on Rollo Homes’ proposals for Plot 1 (PDF)
- WHaM’s comments on proposals for St Catherine’s Place (Plot 4) (PDF)
Responding to planning strategy
Bedminster Green was highlighted as a favoured location for high-rise housing in Bristol City Council’s Urban Living document. The new policies in the Urban Living and Local Plan documents will dramatically alter Bristol’s landscape over the next decades – in particular by increasing the amount of high-rise building. WHaM submitted comments on the draft documents and attended a consultation meeting in June 2018. It is clear that community reaction is decisively against high-rise buildings as you can see from the responses received – 37% were from Bedminster residents!
A final version of the Urban Living SPD was agreed by the Council in November 2018.
Further community consultation on the Local Plan is scheduled for March 2019.
Questions to Bristol City Council
As well as regularly attending meteings with Council representatives, WHaM submitted questions to the Full Council meetings on 8 November and 13 December 2016. Our questions and answers from Mayor Marvin Rees are summarised below.
Trees on the Green
WHaM conveyed residents concerns about potential felling of mature trees on the Green and asked if the trees could be protected. The Mayor stated that the trees are currently protected as they are on Council-owned land and added:
“Urbis have a time limited exclusivity agreement with the Council to explore development options in the Bedminster Green area. This agreement does not give Urbis any permission to fell existing trees and I am very keen to protect trees in the city.
Development proposals for the area will be considered against a range of local planning policies, including DM17 which seeks to integrate important existing trees in new developments. Such consideration will be through the submission of a planning application which will be the subject of full public consultation. Any trees that are agreed to be lost have to be adequately compensated for by new planting set out by the Bristol Tree Replacement Standard.”
WHaM asked why an initial figure of 650 homes in the Bedminster Green development appeared to have mushroomed to over 800 units. The Mayor replied:
“Urbis currently have a pre-application submission lodged with the Council which proposes approximately 855 homes. This high-level submission requires further detailed work in order to assess whether this reflects the true development capacity of the area.
The precise number of homes provided will only be established once Urbis make a planning application, which will be subject to full public consultation. As Local Planning Authority, the desire to produce a significant number of additional homes will have to be considered alongside other local planning policies including environmental considerations and the capacity of local infrastructure.”
Affordable housing, social housing and ‘viability assessments’
Several WHaM members asked if ‘social’ housing would be included in Bedminster Green; however the Mayor’s answers consistently referred to ‘affordable housing’:
“The Council, when disposing of its land, will require the developer to provide at least 30% affordable housing on that land. Outside of the Council’s land, in terms of the parts of the development area that are privately owned, these will be subjected to the Council’s planning policies which are to seek up to 30% affordable housing negotiated through the Council’s planning policies … we are meeting with citywide developers regularly to ensure that they work towards our aims on affordable housing.”
Some background is useful to put this answer in context – it’s not a pretty picture. ‘Affordable housing’ is for people whose needs are not met by the housing market; it includes housing which is available for “affordable rent, social rent, intermediate rent, shared ownership and affordable home ownership”. In May 2016 the Government also classified ‘Starter Homes’ as ‘affordable housing’. These homes can sell for up to £250,000 (outside London) – so not exactly what most people would consider affordable.
The story doesn’t end there either: central Government planning policy allows developers to avoid providing any affordable housing (as in the proposed St Catherine’s development). As the Mayor puts it:
“Our planning policy is overridden by government planning policy which says that if a developer can demonstrate (using a calculation which is very much in the developer’s favour) that affordable housing is not viable within a scheme, then the local authority’s policy is overridden.”
We asked about proposed healthcare facilities in Bedminster Green, the Mayor replied:
“I understand that Urbis are in discussions with a health practice and I am informed that the current proposals are for an 8,500 sq ft health facility. I also understand that there are proposals for a dental practice within the same building.”
Urbis and the Council
Several questions referred to the Council’s relationship with developer Urbis. The Mayor’s answers emphasise that the Council is not leading the Bedminster Green project and that it has not yet agreed to sell the land it owns to Urbis.
“Urbis have a fixed term (18 month) exclusivity arrangement with the Council to develop a framework for the area, following an approach by Urbis to acquire various parcels of land that the Council owns.
The Council didn’t provide a specific brief for this work; however, the need to provide a policy compliant level of affordable housing (30%) on the Council’s land has been made clear to Urbis, along with the need to comply with the Council’s other local plan policies.
Because the Council is not leading on the delivery of development in this area, the Council has not carried out local consultation but it has made the requirements of the Council’s Statement of Community Involvement clear to Urbis.”
We asked about current and prospective employment within the Bedminster Green development area. The Mayor replied:
“The current and proposed employment within the Bedminster Green area has been assessed by Urbis using standard employment assessment tables to inform the proposed planning application. On this basis, Urbis calculate that 137 people are currently employed within the area. This includes an allowance of 35 people being employed in the vacant properties.
On the same assessment basis, it is estimated that a total of 335 jobs will be provided in the proposed scheme. This employment is expected to be split 129 retail, 124 offices, 7 within the proposed energy centre and 75 in the medical centre.”
Green space and clean air
We asked about safeguarding green space in Bedminster Green. The Mayor replied:
“The Council has planning policies (BCS9 and DM17) which state that development which would result in the loss of open space which is locally important for recreation, leisure and community use, townscape and visual amenity will not normally be permitted, unless the proposed loss is required to achieve other policy aims and that suitable mitigation or replacement open space is provided. These policies will be a major consideration when the Council examines the development proposals in its role as local planning authority.”
We also made a statement on our concerns about clean air.
- Listen to WHaM’s statement on clean air issues (20:57-21:12)
Bedminster Green planning applications
The Council will be assessing any planning applications against the Bristol Local Plan – and the Mayor states that they will be “doing our best to secure development right for the local community”. He also states:
“This scheme is still at the pre-application stage. Whilst I am fully committed to maximising the number of homes delivered in the city, I expect to see quality development that is responsive to the local area.
Any proposals being put forward by Urbis will be subject to further scrutiny by the Council in its role as local planning authority, which will consider issues such as the scale and density of the development and will apply the relevant local plan policies. Any decision on any forthcoming planning application will be made by the Council’s Development Control Committee, following public consultation.”